Notes sur les tags :
Réaliser des modifications :
Pour modifier ce document, il est nécessaire d'être connecté au site. Pour cela, assurez-vous d'avoir des identifiants valides. Si vous n'en avez pas,
contactez-nous. Pour vous connecter, cliquez sur l'icône
dans la barre de navigation.
Résumé et points clés
Objectives: To summarize the validity of caregiver-centered delirium detection tools in hospitalized adults and assess associated patient and caregiver outcomes.
Design: Systematic review.
Setting: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus from inception to May 15, 2017.
Participants: Hospitalized adults.
Intervention: Caregiver-centered delirium detection tools.
Measurements: We drafted a protocol from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Two reviewers independently completed abstract and full-text review, data extraction, and quality assessment. We summarized findings using descriptive statistics including mean, median, standard deviation, range, frequencies (percentages), and Cohen's kappa. Studies that reported on the validity of caregiver-centered delirium detection tools or associated patient and caregiver outcomes and were cohort or cross-sectional in design were included.
Results: We reviewed 6,056 titles and abstracts, included 6 articles, and identified 6 caregiver-centered tools. All tools were designed to be administered in several minutes or less and had 11 items or fewer. Three tools were caregiver administered (completed independently by caregivers): Family Confusion Assessment Method (FAM-CAM), Informant Assessment of Geriatric Delirium (I-AGeD), and Sour Seven. Three tools were caregiver informed (administered by a healthcare professional using caregiver input): Single Question in Delirium (SQiD), Single Screening Question Delirium (SSQ-Delirium), and Stressful Caregiving Response to Experiences of Dying. Caregiver-administered tools had better psychometric properties (FAM-CAM sensitivity 75%, 95% confidence interval (CI)=35-95%, specificity 91%, 95% CI=74-97%; Sour Seven positive predictive value 89.5%, negative predictive value 90%) than caregiver-informed tools (SQiD: sensitivity 80%, 95% CI=28.4-99.5%; specificity 71%, 95% CI=41.9-91.6%; SSQ-Delirium sensitivity 79.6%, specificity 56.1%).
Conclusion: Delirium detection is essential for appropriate delirium management. Caregiver-centered delirium detection tools show promise in improving delirium detection and associated patient and caregiver outcomes. Comparative studies using larger sample sizes and multiple centers are required to determine validity and reliability characteristics.
Références de l'article
- Validation of Caregiver-Centered Delirium Detection Tools: A Systematic Review.
- Validation of Caregiver-Centered Delirium Detection Tools: A Systematic Review.
- Rosgen B, Krewulak K, Demiantschuk D, Ely EW, Davidson JE, Stelfox HT, Fiest KM
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- 2018
- J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jul;66(6):1218-1225. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15362. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
- Aged, *Caregivers, Delirium/*diagnosis, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Symptom Assessment/*methods
- Syndromes_Geriatriques, Soins, Syndromes_Geriatriques, Confusion, Neurocognitif, Détection, Outil_clinique, Revue_systématique, Aidants_Soignants
- Liens
- Traduction automatique en Français sur Google Translate
- DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15362
- PMID: 29671281
- Articles similaires
- Cité par
- Références
- Twitter
- Twitter cet article (lien vers l'article)
- Twitter cet article (lien vers cette page)
Éditer la discussion
Références