Adopter cette revue :
Si vous souhaitez prendre en charge cette revue d'article, merci de remplacer le tag Non_attribué par Attribué et ajoutez aussi votre nom d'utilisateur à l'emplacement prévu.
Réaliser des modifications :
Pour modifier ce document, il est nécessaire d'être connecté au site. Pour cela, assurez-vous d'avoir des identifiants valides. Si vous n'en avez pas, contactez-nous. Pour vous connecter, cliquez sur l'icône dans la barre de navigation.
Demander la finalisation de la revue de l'article :
Une fois revue et complétée, merci de remplacer l'étiquette Non_finalisé par A_finaliser. Un administrateur se chargera de valider la revue et de la publier avec le tag Finalisé.
Résumé et points clés
Background/objectives: Several scoring systems have been specifically developed for risk stratification in COVID-19 patients.
Design: We compared, in a cohort of confirmed COVID-19 older patients, three specifically developed scores with a previously established early warning score. Main endpoint was all causes in-hospital death.
Setting: This is a single-center, retrospective observational study, conducted in the Emergency Department (ED) of an urban teaching hospital, referral center for COVID-19.
Participants: We reviewed the clinical records of the confirmed COVID-19 patients aged 60 years or more consecutively admitted to our ED over a 6-week period (March 1st to April 15th, 2020). A total of 210 patients, aged between 60 and 98 years were included in the study cohort.
Measurements: International Severe Acute Respiratory Infection Consortium Clinical Characterization Protocol-Coronavirus Clinical Characterization Consortium (ISARIC-4C) score, COVID-GRAM Critical Illness Risk Score (COVID-GRAM), quick COVID-19 Severity Index (qCSI), National Early Warning Score (NEWS).
Results: Median age was 74 (67-82) and 133 (63.3%) were males. Globally, 42 patients (20.0%) deceased. All the score evaluated showed a fairly good predictive value with respect to in-hospital death. The ISARIC-4C score had the highest area under ROC curve (AUROC) 0.799 (0.738-0.851), followed by the COVID-GRAM 0.785 (0.723-0.838), NEWS 0.764 (0.700-0.819), and qCSI 0.749 (0.685-0.806). However, these differences were not statistical significant.
Conclusion: Among the evaluated scores, the ISARIC-4C and the COVID-GRAM, calculated at ED admission, had the best performance, although the qCSI had similar efficacy by evaluating only three items. However, the NEWS, already widely validated in clinical practice, had a similar performance and could be appropriate for older patients with COVID-19.
Références de l'article
Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19 Older Patients with Specifically Developed Scores.
Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19 Older Patients with Specifically Developed Scores.
Covino M, De Matteis G, Burzo ML, Russo A, Forte E, Carnicelli A, Piccioni A, Simeoni B, Gasbarrini A, Franceschi F, Sandroni C, GEMELLI AGAINST COVID-19 Group
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
2021
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jan;69(1):37-43. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16956. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
Cette section peut être éditée par les relecteurs, les rédacteurs, les modérateurs et les administrateurs. Elle regroupe l'ensemble des échanges autours de la référence ci-dessus présentée.
Référez-vous à cette page pour connaître le rôle des utilisateurs et pour participer à la discussion.
Il n'y a, pour l'instant, aucune discussion en cours.