Notes sur les tags :
Réaliser des modifications :
Pour modifier ce document, il est nécessaire d'être connecté au site. Pour cela, assurez-vous d'avoir des identifiants valides. Si vous n'en avez pas,
contactez-nous. Pour vous connecter, cliquez sur l'icône
dans la barre de navigation.
Résumé et points clés
Background: Patients with dementia due to neurodegenerative disease can have dementia-related psychosis. The effects of the oral 5-HT(2A) inverse agonist and antagonist pimavanserin on psychosis related to various causes of dementia are not clear.
Methods: We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled discontinuation trial involving patients with psychosis related to Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, frontotemporal dementia, or vascular dementia. Patients received open-label pimavanserin for 12 weeks. Those who had a reduction from baseline of at least 30% in the score on the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms-Hallucinations and Delusions (SAPS-H+D, with higher scores indicating greater psychosis) and a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) at weeks 8 and 12 were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to continue receiving pimavanserin or to receive placebo for up to 26 weeks. The primary end point, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, was a relapse of psychosis as defined by any of the following: an increase of at least 30% in the SAPS-H+D score and a CGI-I score of 6 (much worse) or 7 (very much worse), hospitalization for dementia-related psychosis, stopping of the trial regimen or withdrawal from the trial for lack of efficacy, or use of antipsychotic agents for dementia-related psychosis.
Results: Of the 392 patients in the open-label phase, 41 were withdrawn for administrative reasons because the trial was stopped for efficacy; of the remaining 351 patients, 217 (61.8%) had a sustained response, of whom 105 were assigned to receive pimavanserin and 112 to receive placebo. A relapse occurred in 12 of 95 patients (13%) in the pimavanserin group and in 28 of 99 (28%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.17 to 0.73; P = 0.005). During the double-blind phase, adverse events occurred in 43 of 105 patients (41.0%) in the pimavanserin group and in 41 of 112 (36.6%) in the placebo group. Headache, constipation, urinary tract infection, and asymptomatic QT prolongation occurred with pimavanserin.
Conclusions: In a trial that was stopped early for efficacy, patients with dementia-related psychosis who had a response to pimavanserin had a lower risk of relapse with continuation of the drug than with discontinuation. Longer and larger trials are required to determine the effects of pimavanserin in dementia-related psychosis. (Funded by Acadia Pharmaceuticals; HARMONY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03325556.).
Références de l'article
- Trial of Pimavanserin in Dementia-Related Psychosis.
- Trial of Pimavanserin in Dementia-Related Psychosis.
- Tariot PN, Cummings JL, Soto-Martin ME, Ballard C, Erten-Lyons D, Sultzer DL, Devanand DP, Weintraub D, McEvoy B, Youakim JM, Stankovic S, Foff EP
- The New England journal of medicine
- 2021
- N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 22;385(4):309-319. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034634.
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antipsychotic Agents/*therapeutic use, Dementia/drug therapy/*psychology, Double-Blind Method, Female, Hallucinations/*drug therapy/etiology, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease/drug therapy/psychology, Piperidines/*therapeutic use, Proportional Hazards Models, Psychotic Disorders/*drug therapy/etiology, Recurrence, Urea/*analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use
- Syndromes_Geriatriques, Neurocognitif, SCPD, pimavanserin, Antipsychotique, Psychose
- Liens
- Traduction automatique en Français sur Google Translate
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034634
- PMID: 34289275
- Articles similaires
- Cité par
- Références
- Twitter
- Twitter cet article (lien vers l'article)
- Twitter cet article (lien vers cette page)
Éditer la discussion
Références