The effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions including outdoor mobility on older adults' physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and falls-related self-efficacy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Geohagen O, et al, Age Ageing 2022.
Adopter cette revue :
Si vous souhaitez prendre en charge cette revue d'article, merci de remplacer le tag Non_attribué par Attribué et ajoutez aussi votre nom d'utilisateur à l'emplacement prévu.
Réaliser des modifications :
Pour modifier ce document, il est nécessaire d'être connecté au site. Pour cela, assurez-vous d'avoir des identifiants valides. Si vous n'en avez pas, contactez-nous. Pour vous connecter, cliquez sur l'icône dans la barre de navigation.
Demander la finalisation de la revue de l'article :
Une fois revue et complétée, merci de remplacer l'étiquette Non_finalisé par A_finaliser. Un administrateur se chargera de valider la revue et de la publier avec le tag Finalisé.
Résumé et points clés
Objective: To determine the effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation interventions which incorporate outdoor mobility on physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and falls-related self-efficacy in older adults.
Design: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro and OpenGrey were searched systematically from inception to June 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of community-based rehabilitation incorporating outdoor mobility on physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and/or falls-related self-efficacy in older adults. Duplicate screening, selection, extraction and appraisal were completed. Results were reported descriptively and with random-effects meta-analyses stratified by population (proactive [community-dwelling], reactive [illness/injury]).
Results: A total of 29 RCTs with 7,076 participants were identified (66% high bias for at least one domain). The outdoor mobility component was predominantly a walking programme with behaviour change. Rehabilitation for reactive populations increased physical activity (seven RCTs, 587 participants. Hedge's g 1.32, 95% CI: 0.31, 2.32), endurance (four RCTs, 392 participants. Hedges g 0.24; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.44) and outdoor mobility (two RCTs with 663 participants. Go out as much as wanted, likelihood of a journey) at intervention end versus usual care. Where reported, effects were preserved at follow-up. One RCT indicated a benefit of rehabilitation for proactive populations on moderate-to-vigorous activity and outdoor mobility. No effect was noted for falls-related self-efficacy, or other outcomes following rehabilitation for proactive populations.
Conclusion: Reactive rehabilitation for older adults may include walking programmes with behaviour change techniques. Future research should address the potential benefit of a walking programme for proactive populations and address mobility-related anxiety as a barrier to outdoor mobility for both proactive and reactive populations.
Références de l'article
The effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions including outdoor mobility on older adults' physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and falls-related self-efficacy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
The effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions including outdoor mobility on older adults' physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and falls-related self-efficacy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geohagen O, Hamer L, Lowton A, Guerra S, Milton-Cole R, Ellery P, Martin FC, Lamb SE, Sackley C, Sheehan KJ
Age and ageing
2022
Age Ageing. 2022 Jun 1;51(6):afac120. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac120.
Cette section peut être éditée par les relecteurs, les rédacteurs, les modérateurs et les administrateurs. Elle regroupe l'ensemble des échanges autours de la référence ci-dessus présentée.
Référez-vous à cette page pour connaître le rôle des utilisateurs et pour participer à la discussion.
Il n'y a, pour l'instant, aucune discussion en cours.